8 found
Order:
  1.  21
    A Decision Aid May Offer Liability Protection for a Bad Obstetrical Outcome: Results of Mock Trials.Suzanne Brodney, Pamela H. Wescott, Benjamin W. Moulton, Katherine Hartmann, Yuchiao Chang & Michael J. Barry - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (4):967-974.
    The objective of this study is to evaluate if use of a patient decision aid, when choosing between a repeat cesarean or a trial of labor after a cesarean, reduces medical liability exposure. The authors conclude that use of a PDA conferred liability protection when potential jurors were presented with a hypothetical malpractice claim against an obstetrician following a TOLAC.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  31
    Reactions of Potential Jurors to a Hypothetical Malpractice Suit Alleging Failure to Perform a Prostate-Specific Antigen Test.Michael J. Barry, Pamela H. Wescott, Ellen J. Reifler, Yuchaio Chang & Benjamin W. Moulton - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):396-402.
    We conducted focus groups with 47 potential jurors who were presented with diferent scenarios in a hypothetical malpractice case involving failure to order a PSA test. Better documentation that a patient made an informed decision to decline a PSA test appeared to provide more medical-legal protection for physicians, especially with the use of a decision aid.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  24
    Reactions of Potential Jurors to a Hypothetical Malpractice Suit Alleging Failure to Perform a Prostate-Specific Antigen Test.Michael J. Barry, Pamela H. Wescott, Ellen J. Reifler, Yuchaio Chang & Benjamin W. Moulton - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):396-402.
    Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen blood test is controversial, as evidence to date has not demonstrated such screening does more good than harm. While the potential benefit of PSA screening on reducing prostate cancer mortality has not been documented in randomized trials, many risks of PSA screening have been well documented. These risks include a substantially higher risk of a prostate cancer diagnosis over a screenee’s lifetime, false-positive and false-negative test results, possible complications from biopsies done in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  21
    Screening for HIV Infection: Risks, Benefits, and the Burden of Proof.Michael J. Barry, Paul D. Cleary & Harvey V. Fineberg - 1986 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 14 (5-6):259-267.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  11
    Screening for HIV Infection: Risks, Benefits, and the Burden of Proof.Michael J. Barry, Paul D. Cleary & Harvey V. Fineberg - 1986 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 14 (5-6):259-267.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. Too Much Information?Michael J. Barry - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (1):4-4.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  38
    Medical Malpractice Implications of PSA Testing for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer.Mary McNaughton Collins, Floyd J. Fowler, Richard G. Roberts, Joseph E. Oesterling, George J. Annas & Michael J. Barry - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):234-242.
    Prostate cancer has become a major health concern of male Americans. It is now the most common nondermatologic cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men. The incidence of detected prostate cancer rose rapidly in recent years, partly because of prostate-specific antigen testing; it is only now tapering off. Screening for prostate cancer with PSA is widespread in the United States, yet controversial: the American Urological Association recommends PSA screening and the American Cancer Society recommends offering screening; (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  13
    Medical Malpractice Implications of PSA Testing for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer.Mary McNaughton Collins, Floyd J. Fowler, Richard G. Roberts, Joseph E. Oesterling, George J. Annas & Michael J. Barry - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):234-242.
    Prostate cancer has become a major health concern of male Americans. It is now the most common nondermatologic cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men. The incidence of detected prostate cancer rose rapidly in recent years, partly because of prostate-specific antigen testing; it is only now tapering off. Screening for prostate cancer with PSA is widespread in the United States, yet controversial: the American Urological Association recommends PSA screening and the American Cancer Society recommends offering screening; (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark